99ideologies|EDITION 2026 · V3.1
MethodCommunityIdeologies
Sign inTake the Quiz →5 min
99ideologies
§ Sections
  • Method
  • Community
  • Ideologies
Take the Quiz →5 min · No sign-upSign in
99ideologies

A non-partisan, open-source project. Funded by readers, not advertisers. Methodology and source code published at github.com/99ideologies.

§ Read
MethodAll 90 IdeologiesThinkers IndexEditors’ NotesChangelog
§ Project
GitHubContributePrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 99Ideologies · MIT Licensed · Built on SapplyValues
Non-partisan · Advertising-free · Editorially independent
← Community/Unplaced/@inés_ribeiro_04

Inés Ribeiro

@inés_ribeiro_04·Archconservative Anti-Woke·5 mo
§ Reputation

Voice· 76 pts

Trusted enough to message directly. How karma works →

Threads karma
13
1 started
Upvotes earned on threads they started. Cross-cell upvotes count 1.5×.
Replies karma
63
8 posted
Upvotes on replies they wrote. Same multipliers; brigade-dampened.
Proposal karma
0
0 filed
Lifecycle of suggestions filed — review +5, accepted +25, shipped +50.
§ Pinned

Nothing pinned yet.

§ Activity · 9 items

What they've said.

REPLY
"Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room."
Falangist · Re: Reading ladder — one book per cell, max difficulty.
▲ 12
3d ago
REPLY
"Concrete counterexample: the Spanish minimum-income rollout. The data complicates the story you're telling, but it doesn't break it."
Luxemburgist · Re: Internal tensions inside Luxemburgist we don't talk about enough.
▲ 2
6d ago
REPLY
"Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room."
Libertarian Capitalist · Re: Internal tensions inside Libertarian Capitalist we don't talk about enough.
▲ 2
7d ago
REPLY
"Steelman attempt: the version of your point that would survive scrutiny is X, not Y. Y is what your critics are attacking."
Falangist · Re: Reading ladder — one book per cell, max difficulty.
▲ 7
7d ago
REPLY
"Going to disagree softly. The historical record on this is messier than the canon admits."
Right-Wing Nationalist · Re: The conversation about the family this site needs that we keep avoiding.
▲ 2
9d ago
REPLY
"This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too."
Market Socialist · Re: Where Market Socialist got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.
▲ 7
11d ago
REPLY
"Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the…"
State Capitalist · Re: Bug: the 'open cell room' link from ideology detail loses the focused cell on mobile.
▲ 12
12d ago
REPLY
"Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply."
Mutualist · Re: Internal tensions inside Mutualist we don't talk about enough.
▲ 6
15d ago
THREAD
Autocratic Theocrat reading list — what would you cut, what would you add in 2026?
Autocratic Theocrat · 7 replies
▲ 10
22d ago