Ambrose Muller

"Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?"

"Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name."

"Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help."

"Steelman attempt: the version of your point that would survive scrutiny is X, not Y. Y is what your critics are attacking."

"This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too."

"Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help."

Where Geo-Libertarian got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.

"Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at."

"I'd take the bet, with a caveat: timing matters more than direction."

"Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the…"