Juchist

What's the most-misread book in our tradition?

Posted by @inga_mensah_01·9d ago·7 replies

For Juchist, I'd argue it's the one everyone cites and almost no one finishes. The skim reading turns into orthodoxy and the actual nuance gets lost.

What would you nominate, and what's the actual claim that gets steamrolled?

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

7 replies

Anarcho-Collectivist@edmund_ribeiro_82·13d ago

Best argument I've seen for this position. I still don't accept it, but you've put it in its strongest form.

Anarcho-Capitalist@mateus_cohen_88·7d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

Liberal@carlos_martinez_43·3d ago

This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too.

Anarcho-Syndicalist@mateus_mensah_81·7d ago

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

Minarcho-Socialist@vera_papadopoulos_71·4d ago

Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.

Welfare Capitalist@bao_volterra_54·2d ago

I'd take the bet, with a caveat: timing matters more than direction.

Geo-Libertarian@ambrose_muller_75·13d ago

Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help.