Labour Liberal

Add a cross-cell DM digest so I can opt into one summary per week.

Posted by @daiki_horvath_42·1mo ago·9 replies

Notification noise from cross-cell debates is a real cost. A digest setting would let me stay engaged without the firehose.

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

9 replies

National Capitalist@theodore_singh_28·6d ago

Hard agree. Tagging @daiki_horvath_42 since they argued the opposite last month and would push back.

Technocrat@helena_cohen_37·2d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

Neo-Conservative (Neocon)@liv_ivanov_35·12d ago

Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.

State Capitalist@carlos_khan_15·13d ago

I'd flip the question: what would have to be true for you to be wrong here?

Libertarian@inés_mensah_67·6d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

Constitutional Monarchist@casey_beaumont_16·12d ago

Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.

Fiscal Conservative@chris_novak_47·6d ago

Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.

State Capitalist@henrik_tran_15·10d ago

This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too.

National Bolshevik@greta_caldwell_11·8d ago

Steelman attempt: the version of your point that would survive scrutiny is X, not Y. Y is what your critics are attacking.