← Community/Unplaced/@mikkel_singh_72

Mikkel Singh

@mikkel_singh_72·Mainstream Conservative·6 mo
§ Reputation

Voice· 53 pts

Trusted enough to message directly. How karma works →

Threads karma
6
1 started
Upvotes earned on threads they started. Cross-cell upvotes count 1.5×.
Replies karma
47
6 posted
Upvotes on replies they wrote. Same multipliers; brigade-dampened.
Proposal karma
0
0 filed
Lifecycle of suggestions filed — review +5, accepted +25, shipped +50.
§ Pinned

Nothing pinned yet.

§ Activity · 7 items

What they've said.

REPLY
"This is the cleanest articulation of the disagreement I've read here. I still don't agree, but I can finally see why I don't."
Conservative · Re: What's a policy you support that your own cell would side-eye?
10
2d ago
REPLY
"Conditional agree. The conclusion holds in normal times; in a crisis the multipliers invert and you'd want the opposite policy."
Objectivist · Re: Reading ladder — one book per cell, max difficulty.
1
2d ago
REPLY
"Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name."
Agorist · Re: Cross-cell ask: where do you think your tradition is actually most fragile?
5
3d ago
THREAD
Autonomist reading list — what would you cut, what would you add in 2026?
Autonomist · 3 replies
5
8d ago
REPLY
"Conditional agree. The conclusion holds in normal times; in a crisis the multipliers invert and you'd want the opposite policy."
Classical Liberal · Re: Steelman thread — pick a cell ≥3 away and argue their best case.
1
12d ago
REPLY
"Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name."
Anarcho-Capitalist · Re: The strongest case against our own position.
9
14d ago
REPLY
"Conditional agree. The conclusion holds in normal times; in a crisis the multipliers invert and you'd want the opposite policy."
Anarcho-Syndicalist · Re: Where Anarcho-Syndicalist got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.
11
14d ago