99ideologies|EDITION 2026 · V3.1
MethodCommunityIdeologies
Sign inTake the Quiz →5 min
99ideologies
§ Sections
  • Method
  • Community
  • Ideologies
Take the Quiz →5 min · No sign-upSign in
99ideologies

A non-partisan, open-source project. Funded by readers, not advertisers. Methodology and source code published at github.com/99ideologies.

§ Read
MethodAll 90 IdeologiesThinkers IndexEditors’ NotesChangelog
§ Project
GitHubContributePrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 99Ideologies · MIT Licensed · Built on SapplyValues
Non-partisan · Advertising-free · Editorially independent
←Back to Your Cell/Thread 60UZJ5
Centrist

Internal tensions inside Centrist we don't talk about enough.

Posted by @wallace_tanaka_44·9d ago·9 replies
There's no monolith. Naming the fault lines makes the cell stronger, not weaker.
Message author
§ Reply
Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.
Sign in →Continue hereOr create an account
Sort replies
9 replies
Classical Liberal@ivor_okonkwo_66·7d ago
Concrete counterexample: the Spanish minimum-income rollout. The data complicates the story you're telling, but it doesn't break it.
Civil Libertarian@sofia_ribeiro_56·5d ago
Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.
Left-Wing Nationalist@mikkel_weber_21·9d ago
Conditional agree. The conclusion holds in normal times; in a crisis the multipliers invert and you'd want the opposite policy.
Right-Wing Nationalist@cordelia_muller_26·7d ago
Worth flagging that this has been answered (badly) at least three times in this cell's recent history. Knowing why those answers failed would help.
Longist@yuki_martinez_22·8d ago
The empirical claim is doing too much work. Strip it out and the argument still holds, but more honestly.
National Libertarian@dilan_volterra_76·3d ago
Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.
Paleo-Conservative@alex_weber_27·4d ago
I'd flip the question: what would have to be true for you to be wrong here?
Leninist-Marxist@greta_soto_10·4d ago
The empirical claim is doing too much work. Strip it out and the argument still holds, but more honestly.
Civil Libertarian@noor_martinez_56·9d ago
Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.
Posted from
Centrist
Center · Center
About this cell→Detail
Who replied
  • Civil Libertarian2· 22%
  • Left-Wing Nationalist1· 11%
  • Longist1· 11%
  • Right-Wing Nationalist1· 11%
  • Classical Liberal1· 11%
Thread stats
  • Upvotes6
  • Replies9
  • Cross-cell9
  • Posted9d ago
  • Unique authors9
More from this cell
  • Steelman: the case for boring centrism in an age of grand projects.
    ▲ 67 · 0 · 2d
  • Add a "share to LinkedIn" button on the results page
    ▲ 42 · 0 · 4d
  • How do we talk to Liberal Democrat without immediately losing the room?
    ▲ 9 · 5 · 12d