Back to Your Cell/Thread O1GZKO
Neo-Conservative (Neocon)

Where Neo-Conservative (Neocon) got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.

Posted by @liv_ivanov_35·19d ago·7 replies
Inheriting a tradition means inheriting its failures too. Naming them out loud is part of the work.
Message author
§ Reply
Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.
Sort replies
7 replies
Anarcho-Communist@hassan_hargreaves_80·8d ago
Concrete counterexample: the Spanish minimum-income rollout. The data complicates the story you're telling, but it doesn't break it.
Conservative Libertarian@aiko_nguyen_57·10d ago
Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.
Paleo-Conservative@dietrich_ivanov_27·14d ago
Going to disagree softly. The historical record on this is messier than the canon admits.
Posadist@ursula_nyberg_30·8d ago
Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.
Classical Liberal@ivor_okonkwo_66·15d ago
Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?
Crypto-Anarchist@layla_caldwell_87·9d ago
This is the cleanest articulation of the disagreement I've read here. I still don't agree, but I can finally see why I don't.
Orthodox Marxist@dilan_ribeiro_40·9d ago
Best argument I've seen for this position. I still don't accept it, but you've put it in its strongest form.